Hi Reinhard,

I have added "-Wl,--as-needed -latomic -Wl,--no-as-needed" to the
Makefile. It is not exactly your patch, but should do it. Let me know if
it doesn't.

- Olaf

Am 17.03.20 um 22:35 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
> Control: forwarded -1 aspectc-develop...@aspectc.org
>
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Olaf, the upstream developer, has a question regarding your patch to 
> aspectc++.
> Would you mind having a look and ideally sharing your reply to everyone?
>
> Thank you!
> -rt
>
> On 3/17/20 11:05 AM, Olaf Spinczyk wrote:
>> Hi Reinhard!
>>
>> Do you understand the reasons behind the patch?
>>
>> The difference is the following addition for linking:
>>
>>  -Wl,--as-needed -latomic -Wl,--no-as-needed
>>
>> (1) I wonder why the atomics (e.g. __atomic_fetch_add_4) are not
>> available by default in armel. They seem to be on most other platforms.
>>
>> (2) Why is "--as-needed ... --no-as-needed" necessary?
>>
>> (3) Could -latomic also be placed at the end of the list of libraries
>> (behind the additional libraries needed for Clang 9.0.x)?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Olaf
>>
>> Am 17.03.20 um 14:10 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>>> Hi aspect c++ developers,
>>>
>>> Would the attached patch be acceptable for svn trunk?
>>>
>>> Please have a look at the Debian bug for context. I'm happy to clarify any 
>>> questions.
>>>
>>> Best
>>> Rt
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> From: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>
>>> Sent: March 17, 2020 7:04:58 AM EDT
>>> To: Ivo De Decker <iv...@debian.org>, 953...@bugs.debian.org
>>> Subject: Bug#953540: aspectc++: FTBFS on armel
>>>
>>> Control: tags -1 patch
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 11:12:16AM +0000, Ivo De Decker wrote:
>>>> package: src:aspectc++
>>>> version: 1:2.2+git20200229-1
>>>> severity: serious
>>>> tags: ftbfs
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The latest upload of aspectc++ to unstable fails on armel:
>>>>
>>>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=aspectc%2B%2B
>>> Fix attached.
>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Ivo
>>> cu
>>> Adrian
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aspectc-developers mailing list
>>> aspectc-develop...@aspectc.org
>>> http://aspectc.org/listinfo/aspectc-developers
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aspectc-developers mailing list
>> aspectc-develop...@aspectc.org
>> http://aspectc.org/listinfo/aspectc-developers
>>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectc-developers mailing list
> aspectc-develop...@aspectc.org
> http://aspectc.org/listinfo/aspectc-developers

Reply via email to