Hi Adam, Sorry for my delay. Now, I think jcc is ready for upload.
Thanks! Cheers Emmanuel El mié., 25 de mar. de 2020 a la(s) 21:12, Adam Borowski (kilob...@angband.pl) escribió: > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 03:14:23AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:59:03PM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote: > > > El dom., 5 de ene. de 2020 a la(s) 18:40, Adam Borowski > > > (kilob...@angband.pl) escribió: > > > > On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 01:37:20AM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote: > > > > > * Package name : jcc > > > > > Version : 3.6-1 > > > > > > > > > It builds those binary packages: > > > > > > > > > > python-jcc - generator for a Python extension from Java classes > > > > > (Python 2) > > > > > python3-jcc - generator for a Python extension from Java classes > > > > > (Python 3) > > > > > jcc - generator for a Python extension from Java classes > > > > > (transitional) > > > > > > > > [Note: a trip through binNEW is required.] > > > I see the changelog still claims: > > * Create python-jcc and python3-jcc packages, and make jcc a transitional > > one. > > while neither python-jcc nor jcc remain. > > > > Also, a cosmetic issue: "X-Python3-Version: >= 3.3" makes lintian complain > > about such an ancient relation being useless. It does no harm, so it's mere > > cleanup. > > Hi! > The RFS is still rotting, for nothing but a changelog entry. Should I just > edit that line and upload as-is? > > > Meow! > -- > ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ > ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ in the beginning was the boot and root floppies and they were good. > ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ -- <willmore> on #linux-sunxi > ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀