Hello, On Mon 06 Apr 2020 at 08:34AM -07, tony mancill wrote:
> The buildwheels.sh in tinyalign is a derived work (there are multiple > non-trivial modifications) from the upstream build-wheels.sh in > pypa/python-manylinux-demo project, so I'm not sure that it's correct to > say that it is necessarily licensed under the CC0. That is, since > CC0 is a "no rights reserved" license, what is prevent the author of the > derived work from releasing under MIT without attribution? > > I am basing that on my reading of the CC0 [1] and its FAQ [2], > specifically the statement: > > CC0 is a useful tool for clarifying that you do not claim > copyright in a work anywhere in the world. > > IANAL and I'm not trying to bikeshed the license question, but it seems > to me that works derived from CC0-licensed works might be different in > this regard. I patched the debian/copyright in [3] to refer to the > original work and its CC0 license, but stopped short of indicating that > the file in tinyalign is licensed under the CC0 because that seems to > impinge upon the rights of author of the derived work. > > Does that address your concerns with the copyright for this file? Makes sense to me. Thanks! -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
