Hello, Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2020, 04:16:03 CEST schrieb 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson: > Purging configuration files for apparmor (2.13.4-1) ... > dpkg: warning: while removing apparmor, directory > '/etc/apparmor.d/local' not empty so not removed $ find > /etc/apparmor.d/local > /etc/apparmor.d/local > /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.bin.man > $ cat /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.bin.man > # Site-specific additions and overrides for usr.bin.man. > # For more details, please see /etc/apparmor.d/local/README.
I don't use Debian ;-) but I have a wild guess / question:
Is the usr.bin.man profile part of the apparmor package, or is is
managed in the man package?
If I can trust $searchengine, the command to check [1] is probably
dpkg -S /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.man
dpkg -S /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.bin.man
If the file is owned by the man package, the man package might need to
co-own the directory, or needs a dependency on the apparmor package to
ensure the directory exists.
Regards,
Christian Boltz
[1] I'm used to rpm -qf $file - but that won't work on Debian ;-)
--
0830?? on day 2 at FOSDEM? Good lord it will be a small miracle
if I'm out of bed at that time, never mind at the venue ;)
[Richard Brown in opensuse-project]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
