Le 12/04/20 à 12:40, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit :
On 4/12/20 10:52 AM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:03:56 +0100 Samuel Thibault <[email protected]>
wrote:
Sebastiaan Couwenberg, le ven. 03 janv. 2020 07:34:42 +0100, a ecrit:
opencv is not on your list however.
Ah, indeed. I wonder why, that was indeed in the list in my memory. And
yes, that adds a lot of packages.
What are we doing here?
Who is "we"?
Debian as a distribution that aims to build on as many architectures as
possible?
The lack of opencv on some ports prevent some parts of gstreamer
(gst-plugins-bad1.0) to be build for example.
My initial reply still stands, not having gdal and everything that
depends on it on ports is preferable over manually maintaining the list
of architectures.
If you want opencv on those architectures, perhaps it should not enable
the gdal support on those architectures.
I'll consider dropping the java package entirely when the package is
updated for GDAL 3.1.0.
An idea when this will be released? Because, I'm currently preparing a
patch[0] to disable the opencv plugin in the gst-plugins-bad1.0 package,
so if opencv is not building on all architectures (due to gdal?),
gst-plugins-bad1.0 will have to keep a list of architectures where to
build its plugin anyway....
[0]
https://salsa.debian.org/gstreamer-team/gst-plugins-bad1.0/-/merge_requests/3/diffs?commit_id=4e6fbd1aa8505b84b1716ad7e22b528619436470
