Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 10:25:30PM +0200, Philipp Huebner wrote: > Hi, > > Am 02.04.2018 um 12:57 schrieb Julien Cristau: > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 14:51:10 +0100, Philipp Huebner wrote: > >> I would like to fix #883987 in boost1.62 for Stretch. > >> The changes are basically the same as what is currently in testing and I > >> got the > >> maintainer's go-ahead in > >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-boost-devel/2018-March/004184.html > >> > > What made these partial specializations not be necessary anymore? That > > seems like critical missing information if we are to make a decision > > here, to know if/what we might be breaking instead. > > my guess is that only upstream can really answer that. > > My work colleague confirmed that we're basically using the same code as > in the example at the upstream bug tracker and it fails when using gcc-6 > on Stretch: > https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/12534 > > > Best wishes, > -- > .''`. Philipp Huebner <[email protected]> > : :' : pgp fp: 6719 25C5 B8CD E74A 5225 3DF9 E5CA 8C49 25E4 205F > `. `'` > `- >
