[ replying to bugreport ] Quoting Andrej Shadura (2020-04-29 17:11:23) > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 05:05:36PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > Because it introduces a regression *while* fixing the issue reported > > > here. > > > > Question was _how_ (not why). > > A correct spelling is no more.
No, you are mistaken: Not about spelling but about semantics. I already understood that you disagree with the change. that you consider the change flawed, in a way that you consider a regression. That is *your* view. I do not have your view, so I try to understand it by asking you to describe more detailed what you *see* as a bug (not what you *interpret* is the solution for it) Here are the questions again: How is "matrix chat protocol" inadequate to tell what package does, which a change to capitalization of initial character fixes? How is "python no-IO library [...] - Python3 library" inadequate to tell what package does, which a change to capitalization of initial character fixes? > > > What I fail to understand is what is so controversial about this > > > request that you are willing to argue about it. > > > > What I fail to understand is what is so controversial about the > > change to capitalization that you are willing to argue about it. > > It is not reciprocal since I pointed out the mistake but you argued > back. What mistake? You see a mistake where I see deliberate change. (I don't say that I am right and you are wrong, only that we see different things.) First we need to establish what is the bug, only then can we meaningfully discuss what is the solution to the bug (and whether the solution is controversial or not). - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
