On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 09:34:34AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Paul Gevers:
> > Dear Benedikt, all,
> > 
> > On 16-04-2020 10:44, Benedikt Tuchen wrote:
> >> While doing an upgrade from Stretch to Buster on a Laptop with XFS
> >> Filesystem in use. After the upgrade the laptop doesn't boot into
> >> the system because of the removed "barrier|nobarrier" mount option
> >> for XFS in version 4.19.
> >>
> >> I think this issue should be mentioned in the "5. Issues to be aware
> >> of for buster" part of the release-notes in Buster.
> > 
> > What is exactly the problem? Does everybody with XFS run into this
> > issue? Do you have a solution for the problem that we can mention? Or,
> > phrased differently, what should the user do if they have an XFS
> > filesystem and want to upgrade to buster?
> > 
> > Paul
> > 
> 
> They would have to remove the "barrier" or "nobarrier" keyword if they
> use either in their fstab (or in scripts that passes that mount option
> explicitly).
> 
> If I try to mount an XFS file system with "barrier" (or "nobarrier"), I
> get cryptic errors like this:
> """
> mount: <path>: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on <path>,
> missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
> """
> 
> (using mount -o ...,barrier - I don't remember if the fstab message is
> better)

Would that refer to the write battier on the hard drive?  Isn't that 
essential to the safe operation of XFS?

-- hendrik

Reply via email to