On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 00:39 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Is there any progress on this bug? Haven't received a response so far.
No progress. The reason I didn't do this is that the libxul-dev (IIRC) package conflicts too much, it removes half of my system, and I don't want that :) > Any help that I can offer to get a xulrunner based libgecko2.0-cil package? yes you can, modify the gecko-sharp(2) package and give us a a patch for it :) -- Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL++++$ P L++$>+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O---- M- V? PS PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r->++ y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
