Hi,

I wonder why these two bugs are considered blockers for this one? From
the 3 scenarios below

  * DHCPv4 only
  * DHCPv6 only
  * DHCPv4 and DHCPv6

only the last one would need to have both started, so only this _might_
have a use for compound target units. But even if they are not
available, one can still enable/start each service separately via its
own service file. This means that 826011 and 826012 are, at most, nice
to have, but in no way are they blocking systemd service files for
isc-dhcp-server, right?

In addition, the current init script based mechanism for running both is
also buggy: When one service got killed, its PID file is still around,
which results in the init script refusing to start ANY of them unless
that PID file is removed.

So, please, replace the current init script with proper, independent
systemd service files for both dhcpdv4 and dhcpdv6 for bullseye. A
compound target unit can still be added later.

Bye...

    Dirk

-- 
Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinri...@altum.de>
GPG Public Key: D01B367761B0F7CE6E6D81AAD5A2E54246986015
Sichere Internetkommunikation: http://www.retroshare.org
Privacy Handbuch: https://www.privacy-handbuch.de

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to