Package: emacs-lucid
Version: 1:26.1+1-3.2+deb10u1
Severity: normal

When I leave the default entry 

```
("gnu" . "https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/";)
```

in `package-archives`, I get the error described here:

https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/58424/is-elpa-broken

However, when  I change the ELPA URL scheme to just `http`,
everything works fine, including signature verification.
Therefore I can see GPG signatures have nothing to do with this,
despite my earlier follow-up to #942413.

I think the answer I got on the stackexchange question might well
be spot on. It points me to:

https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34341#46

which may be a good thing to backport to Debian's 26.1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.4
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-9-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages emacs-lucid depends on:
ii  emacs-bin-common       1:26.1+1-3.2+deb10u1
ii  emacs-common           1:26.1+1-3.2+deb10u1
ii  libacl1                2.2.53-4
ii  libasound2             1.1.8-1
ii  libc6                  2.28-10
ii  libcairo2              1.16.0-4
ii  libdbus-1-3            1.12.16-1
ii  libfontconfig1         2.13.1-2
ii  libfreetype6           2.9.1-3+deb10u1
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0     2.38.1+dfsg-1
ii  libgif7                5.1.4-3
ii  libglib2.0-0           2.58.3-2+deb10u2
ii  libgnutls30            3.6.7-4+deb10u3
ii  libgomp1               8.3.0-6
ii  libgpm2                1.20.7-5
ii  libice6                2:1.0.9-2
ii  libjpeg62-turbo        1:1.5.2-2+b1
ii  liblcms2-2             2.9-3
ii  libm17n-0              1.8.0-2
ii  libmagickcore-6.q16-6  8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1
ii  libmagickwand-6.q16-6  8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1
ii  libotf0                0.9.13-4
ii  libpng16-16            1.6.36-6
ii  librsvg2-2             2.44.10-2.1
ii  libselinux1            2.8-1+b1
ii  libsm6                 2:1.2.3-1
ii  libsystemd0            241-7~deb10u4
ii  libtiff5               4.1.0+git191117-2~deb10u1
ii  libtinfo6              6.1+20181013-2+deb10u2
ii  libx11-6               2:1.6.7-1
ii  libx11-xcb1            2:1.6.7-1
ii  libxcb1                1.13.1-2
ii  libxext6               2:1.3.3-1+b2
ii  libxfixes3             1:5.0.3-1
ii  libxft2                2.3.2-2
ii  libxinerama1           2:1.1.4-2
ii  libxml2                2.9.4+dfsg1-7+b3
ii  libxmu6                2:1.1.2-2+b3
ii  libxpm4                1:3.5.12-1
ii  libxrandr2             2:1.5.1-1
ii  libxrender1            1:0.9.10-1
ii  libxt6                 1:1.1.5-1+b3
ii  xaw3dg                 1.5+E-18.3
ii  zlib1g                 1:1.2.11.dfsg-1

emacs-lucid recommends no packages.

Versions of packages emacs-lucid suggests:
ii  emacs-common-non-dfsg  1:26.1+1-1

-- no debconf information

Reply via email to