On 22/05/2020 03.10, Axel Beckert wrote:
> I though see one problem with this: IIRC, the piuparts guys sometimes
> use debsums as backport on stable.
> Cc'ing them if this is still the case and if they see any issues if a
> debsums upload in the not-so-far future would depend on a very recent
> dpkg version. (IIRC last time they needed a debsums backport, this was
> because we fixed bugs they wanted to be fixed in their setups as soon
> as they were found and fixed.)

That was for the introduction of the --ignore-obsolete option which
allowed us to get rid of many false positives (and finally make debsums
errors fail the piuparts test). We don't need any newer debsums than that.


Reply via email to