Hi, intrigeri wrote: > I did not dare proposing this course of action so far because the > notes from our BoF at DebConf19 are a bit ambiguous about whether we > decided to remove the package from sid, in addition to removing it > from testing.
I wasn't at the BoF, but was opposing rather strongly afterwards since
I was not aware that libdpkg-dev is partially a fork and provides the
same functionality. (And I didn't want to loose the changelog parsing
functionality in aptitude.)
Since Guillem cleared up this and even provided a patch for aptitude
(which is applied and in testing for a week or two), I changed my
opinion on this topic completely.
> If another team member +1's the package removal, I'll happily proceed.
Seconded. :-)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <[email protected]>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
