Hi Aaron,
Aaron M. Ucko, on 2020-06-09 10:32:20 -0400:
> Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 02:25:58PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> >> My current impression is that makeblastdb is unable to work
> >> properly on most 32 bits machines, because the amount of memory
> >> needing to be addressed by the process looks like it might
> >> exceed too easily 32 bits architectural limits.
>
> That's entirely plausible; upstream tends to assume 64-bit systems
> nowadays. Explicitly supplying -blastdb_version 4 (the default prior to
> BLAST+ 2.10.x) may help.
It looks good on my eeepc:
# makeblastdb -blastdb_version 4 -dbtype nucl \
-in GenBank/NC_005816.fna -parse_seqids -hash_index \
-max_file_sz 20MB -taxid 10
Building a new DB, current time: 06/09/2020 17:20:11
New DB name: /tmp/python-biopython/Tests/GenBank/NC_005816.fna
New DB title: GenBank/NC_005816.fna
Sequence type: Nucleotide
Keep MBits: T
Maximum file size: 20000000B
Adding sequences from FASTA; added 1 sequences in 0.367298 seconds.
# _
And no need for PAE. :)
Thank you for the workaround!
Thanks Andreas for the forward!
Let's squash that bug.
Cheers everyone,
--
Étienne Mollier <etienne.moll...@mailoo.org>
Fingerprint: 5ab1 4edf 63bb ccff 8b54 2fa9 59da 56fe fff3 882d
Help find cures against the Covid-19 ! Give CPU cycles:
* Rosetta@home: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/
* Folding@home: https://foldingathome.org/
