Am 19. Juni 2020 12:52:40 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de>: >So nothing that keeps us from using GCC in cases where clang is not >available.
Correct. Except staying as close as possible with upstream. >>> Not sure why you want to enforce architectures off libreoffice when >>> it’s technically not necessary. >> >> Read the comment. > >That's just your personal way of implementing it. It's not mandatory to >do it >this way. You can just create a simple whitelist where clang is always >enabled >and disabled on any other architecture. It's not really rocket science. Trust me, I know. I do this for all kind of stuff in rules (e.g. for skia itself, see below) >It's also not a given that clang generates faster code on _any_ given >architecture, >it might be true for x86_64, but not necessarily for armhf or s390x. s390x doesn't matter here at all as it is be and skia doesn't support be at all. Thus we get --disable-skia and thus no clang usage. But generally you're right, but I am trying to stay as close upstream as possible here. Regards Rene