On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 09:22:18AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:

Hi,

> Alternatively, perhaps replacing the mount.exfat link with something like
> the following would be a better option, to transparently support kernels
> with and without the native module:
> 
> #!/bin/sh
> 
> if grep -qF exfat /proc/filesystems || modinfo exfat > /dev/null 2>&1 ; then
>       mount -i $*
> else
>       mount.exfat-fuse $*
> fi

Well as soon as a recent kernel enters testing I believe it
would just cause confusion. Main audience to profit would be
people using testing/unstable with an old or custom kernel
and none Linux ports from my point of view.
Would that help someone in the end?

Cheers,
Sven

Reply via email to