Package: smplayer Version: 18.10.0~ds0-1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? Every so many times Smplayer is used, an anoying dialog box asking for money pops up. For now it is only smplayer, but if others follow the example, we will essentially turn Debian into shareware. A pop up asking for money is detrimental to Debian reputation. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was the outcome of this action? * What outcome did you expect instead? *** End of the template - remove these template lines *** -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.4 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-9-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages smplayer depends on: ii libc6 2.28-10 ii libgcc1 1:8.3.0-6 ii libqt5core5a 5.11.3+dfsg1-1+deb10u3 ii libqt5dbus5 5.11.3+dfsg1-1+deb10u3 ii libqt5gui5 5.11.3+dfsg1-1+deb10u3 ii libqt5network5 5.11.3+dfsg1-1+deb10u3 ii libqt5script5 5.11.3+dfsg-3 ii libqt5widgets5 5.11.3+dfsg1-1+deb10u3 ii libqt5xml5 5.11.3+dfsg1-1+deb10u3 ii libstdc++6 8.3.0-6 ii libx11-6 2:1.6.7-1 ii mplayer 2:1.3.0-8+b4 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.11.dfsg-1 Versions of packages smplayer recommends: ii smplayer-l10n 18.10.0~ds0-1 ii smplayer-themes 1:18.6.0-1 smplayer suggests no packages. -- no debconf information