Hello Michael, On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 04:18:22PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 06.07.20 um 15:41 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann: > > I'm now reporting the errors for your project. If future reports > > should use another channel, please let me know. > > Ideally such a change request is submitted via salsa as merge request.
As stated in my introduction, this is not (easily) possible, sorry. > This makes it much easier to comment on the individual changes. I can send each change individually, some other projects (like man-pages itself) request this. Do you want this in future reports (if any)? > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/init-system-helpers/ > > > Man page: deb-systemd-invoke.1p > > Issue: Groff code broken? > > > > "\\&B<deb-systemd-invoke> start|stop|restart I<unitÂ\\ file>Â\\ ..." > > Can't really comment on that one. The resulting man page looks fine to me? > That man pages is generated via pod2man, could this be a toolchain issue? Probably. > > -- > > Man page: deb-systemd-invoke.1p > > Issue: 206 → 2006? > > > > "Jan 206" > > > I can't find any reference to "Jan 206" in the deb-systemd-invoke man > page. Can you point the source location? > Did you by chance confuse that with the service(8) man page which was > fixed just recently: > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/init-system-helpers/-/commit/f1b835dcb2d6198addfab045676351d70d2930e9 Yes, my fault, it was service(8). > > -- > > Man page: deb-systemd-invoke.1p > > Issue: s/it to/to/ > > > > "The I<SCRIPT> parameter specifies a System V init script, located in > > B</etc/" > > "init.d/>I<SCRIPT>. The supported values of I<COMMAND> depend on the > > invoked " > > "script, B<service> passes I<COMMAND> and I<OPTIONS> it to the init script " > > "unmodified. All scripts should support at least the B<start> and B<stop> " > > "commands. As a special case, if I<COMMAND> is B<--full-restart>, the > > script " > > "is run twice, first with the B<stop> command, then with the B<start> > > command." > > Can't find that paragraph either Sorry, this is also in service.8 > > -- > > Man page: update-rc.d.8 > > Issue: insserv(8) → B<insserv>(8) > > > > "update-rc.d requires dependency and runlevel information to be provided in > > " > > "the init.d script LSB comment header of all init.d scripts. See the " > > "insserv(8) manual page for details about the LSB header format." > > -- > > Man page: update-rc.d.8 > > Issue: update-rc.d → B<update-rc.d> > > > > "When invoked with the I<remove> option, update-rc.d removes any links in > > the " > > "B</etc/rc>I<runlevel>B<\\&.d> directories to the script B</etc/init.d/" > > ">I<name>\\&. The script must have been deleted already. If the script is > > " > > "still present then B<update-rc.d> aborts with an error message." > > Those are generated via rst2man. I suposse wrapping them in `` `` would > suffice? I don't know rst2man, so I cannot answer this question. Thanks for your ultra fast response and maintenance. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature