Hi, There's a serious bug when I am uploading afdko package, that one of the binaries in this package "tx" has name conflicting with transifex-client.
https://bugs.debian.org/965151 I am currently considering doing it by moving all binaries of afdko from /usr/bin to /usr/bin/afdko, and then creating another package afdko-legacy, that, similar to node-legacy before node changed the name to ax25-node, symlinks all binaries from /usr/bin/afdko back to /usr/bin. This will decrease the mess of one package having multiple binaries, and ensure the compatibility of font building scripts that invokes afdko tx. Does it require CTTE agreement since afdko-legacy is also in conflict with tx? Another python module package that's in my ITP also invokes afdko's tx: https://bugs.debian.org/962383 How other packages that depends on nodejs did when its name was nodejs? And how did they use nodejs on package building and/or run-time? Ref on nodejs vs node CTTE: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/07/msg00002.html Thanks, Yao Wei
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
