Am Dienstag, 1. September 2020, 18:38:30 CEST schrieben Sie: I am answering myself. Well, downgrading libqt5webengine5 and its dependencies sadly did not work. None of a qt-based application would start, due to the wrong version of libqt5core5a.
To get it running, I would have to downgrade the whole system, and I fear, this will kill my whole system - besides it is also a lot of work. Work does not matter much, but killing my system does. I am pretty sure, the issue appeared with the change from 5.12 to 5.14, around 5th of july. Checked the other logs, but there were no major changes. And I am upgrading almost every day, so I saw this issue very fast. As I am doing so, I always see most issues very fast! I hope, this helps either. Best regards Hans > Am Dienstag, 1. September 2020, 17:34:39 CEST schrieben Sie: > Hi John, > > thanks for taking care of this. I know, Ireported this issue before, but > could not find it again. And I was notz sure, if I reported it or asked a > question in the debian forum. > > For the timeline, I am not quite sure, when this started, as I am upgrading > every day. But I believe, it might begin at Jul 5 2020, when I upgraded from > version 5.12.5+dfsg-7+b3 to 5.14.2+dfsg1-2. > > This is very close to the time, I noticed the issue. > > I will try to reinstall 5.12.XXX , but as it is no more in the repo, I > search for it in backports.debian.org. > > At the momen I am not sure, if this will succeed, as the new version was > installed due to a dependency of several other packages. I will give it a > try and then send the result. > > Again, thanks for the help and you need not apologize for inactivity. This > is all free work here and we are all thankfull, that people are still > motivated to develop great things (like debian!). > > Oh, one important note: This issue appears only on i386 (intel processor), > amd64 is good. I did not test it on 32-bit armhf on my Raspberry Pi as there > isi no plasma5 and kmail installed on it. > > Cheers and beers! > > Hans > > > Control: reassign -1 libqt5webengine5 > > Control: forcemerge 967011 -1 > > > > Hi, > > > > Sorry for the inactivity, but it seems you've reported this bug once > > before > > as #967011 so I'm merging your report with that. I hope I'll be able to > > reproduce in a virtual machine. If so, this bug will probably be > > release-critical. > > > > If you have an idea of when this started, could you check logs like > > /var/log/apt/history.log to narrow down the involved packages?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
