Package: fwupd Followup-For: Bug #968997 X-Debbugs-Cc: deb...@rocketjump.eu
Hi again, today I was offered an upgrade to 0.1.69, and that update ran through without problems. So it seems as though the 0.1.68 update was faulty for some reason. If the faulty update was rejected by the firmware, it would be at least nice to get notified as the user. But I don't know fwupdmgr well enough to say if that's something the running system firmware gives feedback on. As a result I'm lowering the severity to wishlist. Regards, Lee -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.7.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_USER, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages fwupd depends on: ii libc6 2.31-3 ii libefiboot1 37-5 ii libefivar1 37-5 ii libelf1 0.180-1+b1 ii libflashrom1 1.2-5 ii libfwupd2 1.4.5-1 ii libfwupdplugin1 1.4.5-1 ii libglib2.0-0 2.64.4-1 ii libgudev-1.0-0 233-1 ii libgusb2 0.3.4-0.2 ii libjcat1 0.1.3-2 ii libjson-glib-1.0-0 1.4.4-2 ii libpolkit-gobject-1-0 0.105-29 ii libsmbios-c2 2.4.3-1 ii libsoup2.4-1 2.70.0-1 ii libsqlite3-0 3.33.0-1 ii libtss2-esys0 2.4.1-1+b1 ii libxmlb1 0.1.15-2 ii shared-mime-info 1.15-1 Versions of packages fwupd recommends: ii bolt 0.9-1 pn fwupd-signed <none> ii python3 3.8.2-3 fwupd suggests no packages. -- no debconf information