That PR patches cleanly against the Debian source; so I'm building a local package version now to test.
Will follow up here and with upstream. Colm On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 at 20:48, Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote: > Am 05.09.20 um 21:31 schrieb Colm Buckley: > > Package: systemd > > Version: 246.4-1~bpo10+1 > > Severity: important > > Tags: ipv6 > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > > > > > > > The current BPO release of systemd includes a serious regression; valid > SLAAC v6 addresses and routes > > > > are discarded under certain circumstances. I believe this to be an > instance of > > > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/16719 which is possibly fixed > by https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/16725 > > > > > > > > > The user-visible symptom is that the systems stop responding on their > SLAAC-configured v6 addresses until the link > > > > is next reconfigured; some time later they drop these addresses again. > > > > > > > > > > An extract from the debug log from systemd-networkd follows: note in > particular the "Removing address" and "Forgetting address" > > > > lines in the log. > > > > > > > > > > I think that pull/16725 should be cherry-picked into Debian as soon as > possible. > > > > Thanks for the bug report. > Could you test the pull request and verify that this fixes your issue > (and ideally also report back to the upstream bug report). > Once the PR is merged upstream, we can consider cherry-picking it. > > Michael > > -- Colm Buckley | c...@tuatha.org
