On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:01:01AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Well I would say that we have a solution but not yet the patch, but > anyway I'll plan to work on writing a patch in the next days.
Oh, great!
thank you for being so quick!
> > > Improvement would be to ship
> > > that single conffile in a separate package (which, IMHO,
> > > src:policy-rcd-declarative could do, i.e. provide a
> > > "policy-rcd-declarative-deny-all" binary; or do fancy things with a
> > > debconf option sbuild-createchroot could inject but that would be too
> > > dirty for me).
> >
> > I'm tempted to clone this bug and make the clone a wishlist bug for such
> > a "policy-rcd-declarative-deny-all" binary. What do you think?
>
> Indeed, that would be awesome.
I opened a new bug instead, to give the policy-rcd-declarative
maintainer some context without being shoved a bugload of comments ^^
https://bugs.debian.org/970027
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
