Hi Jörg On 2020-10-04 17:32:34 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > Hello Sebastian, > > > > Am Sonntag, den 04.10.2020, 16:39 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > > > On 2020-09-29 08:36:46 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > > Usertags: binnmu > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > please rebuild the following packages to use the new lib after rename > > > libsane to > > > libsane1. > > > > > > > > > nmu colord_1.4.4-2 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.' > > > nmu gimagereader_3.3.1-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.' > > > nmu hplip_3.20.5+dfsg0-3 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.' > > > nmu haskell-bindings-sane_0.0.1-13 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new > > > libsane1.' > > > nmu libimage-sane-perl_5-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.' > > > nmu libinsane_1.0.7-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.' > > > nmu libkf5sane_20.08.0-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.' > > > nmu wine_5.0-4 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.' > > > nmu pike8.0_8.0.702-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.' > > > nmu pillow-sane_2.8.3-4 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.' > > > nmu libreoffice_1:7.0.1-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.' > > > nmu sane-frontends_1.0.14-16 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.' > > > nmu scanbd_1.5.1-6 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.' > > > nmu simple-scan_3.36.4-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.' > > > nmu xsane_0.999-9 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.' > > > > I'm not really sure what you're trying to achieve here. You've asked > > for a transition slot (#960046) but completely ignored the moreinfo tag > > and then went ahead anways. In any case, for a proper transition we > > would have tracked binNMUs in that bug report instead of a new one. > > > > I refer to the mail from Raphael Hertzog. In [1] he says that the transition > is > no longer necessary and that I should ask for a binNMU. > > > I think that this effectively reopens #908681 which I will unarchive and > > reopen. > > With the Upstream Release 1.0.31 7 functions have been removed. This was also > entered in the changelog and the #MISSING was not removed from the symbols > file. > > [quote] > * debian/libsane1.symbols: > - Remove 7 not longer available symbols.
In that case, having libsane depend on libsane1 is completely wrong. They don't provide compatible ABIs anymore. If upstream broke ABI, do a proper transition. Ideally, upstream would also bump the SONAME in that case. Best > [/quote] > > > > Cheers > > CU > Jörg > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969291#35 > -- > New: > GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D > GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D > GPG Key : 8CA1D25D > CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56 > > Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31). > > Jörg Frings-Fürst > D-54470 Lieser > > > git: https://jff.email/cgit/ > > Threema: SYR8SJXB > Wire: @joergfringsfuerst > Skype: joergpenguin > Ring: jff > Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst > > > My wish list: > - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home. > -- Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
