Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com> writes: > > upstream is asking to treat offlineimap and offlineimap3 as separate > package. https://github.com/OfflineIMAP/offlineimap3/issues/10
I think we should preserve offlineimap until offlineimap3 is released, and then we can probably rename offlineimap3 once offlineimap is considered unsupported by the maintainers. Thoughts? -- Brett M. Gilio bre...@gnu.org https://brettgilio.com/ E82A C026 95D6 FF02 43CA 1E5C F6C5 2DD1 BA27 CB87
