severity: minor (I have no idea if that will work: I'm not a DD, nor the reporter. But this is definitely minor, if not normal)
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 11:43:48 +0200 Domenico Cufalo <cuf...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > > I would like to add my vote in favor of the request to enable > PipeWire support. As would I > Yes, I do know that this request, as it seems, has already been > rejected for security reasons (see bug #886358)*, Actually, though the bugs look related, they aren't. That bug is about installing Google-specific extensions to chromium by default. This one regards enabling a setting. To be clear, the change wouldn't enable it for everyone: it would only make it possible for it to be enabled by a savvy user. > but this lack > renders Chromium unusable for remote working and this is a problem in > a period like this, characterized by the lock-down for Covid-19. > > Due to this lack I was forced to install Google Chrome, but i would > by far prefer to be able to use Chromium, instead. I agree. I would rather not have to install Chrome manually, especially when such a minor change could make the difference. > Therefore, I would ask you to reconsider the question of whether to > enable that support, if possible. > > In the meantime, I thank you for all your efforts in maintaining this > excellent browser and I send you my best regards. I agree here, too. It looks like your trying to maintain packaging for one of the largest open-source projects on your own (at least, with only 1 other person helping). If you need a hand, just ask!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
