Hey Gunnar, That’s a good point you’ve raised. Personally I’m leaning towards the name podman-toolbox because it explicitly states the container runtime which toolbox is designed for; Although it doesn’t quite roll off the tongue as nice as container-toolbox.
Although I’m open for suggestions/feedback. Hayley > On 24 Oct 2020, at 05:13, Gunnar Wolf <gw...@debian.org> wrote: > > Hayley Hughes dijo [Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 09:31:30PM +1100]: >> * Package name : toolbox >> (...) >> Toolbox is a tool that offers a familiar package based environment for >> developing and debugging software that runs fully unprivileged using Podman. >> >> The toolbox environment is based on an OCI image such as fedora-toolbox. >> This image is used to create a toolbox container that seamlessly integrates >> with the rest of the operating system. >> (...) > > The name "toolbox" is very non-descriptive. There are many different > toolboxes for different things in Debian. Even though this is, of > course, upstream's chosen project name, I suggest you to consider > qualifying the name in a way to make it clearer - probably something > like "toolbox-container", "container-toolbox" or something like that?
