Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 12.11.2020, 18:21 +0100 schrieb Pallai Roland: > Hi Markus, > > The problem is still the same here:
Thanks for your debug log. I have looked at every line of code again and compared the original upstream patch from here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1722701 with the released fix from here https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/pull/2210/commits/7babd406e7195fcce57850a8589b06e095642c33 There is only one thing that stands out, in fencing/commands.c if client = NULL, then they assume now it is a peer and this is always allowed to interact. For me it is the only explanation at the moment why you still see Rejecting IPC request 'lrmd_rsc_info' from unprivileged client crmd If you take a closer look at the patch then the allowed variable must be true in lrmd/lrmd.c but in your case it is (incorrectly) false. Since crmd is part of pacemaker it should not be rejected. Please try the new version at https://people.debian.org/~apo/lts/pacemaker/ and report back if that addresses the problem. Thanks, Markus
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
