On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 01:34:44PM -0500, David Steele wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 1:15 PM Bill Allombert <ballo...@debian.org> wrote: > > > What about devtodo ? > > > > Reading your summary, it seems that the todo.txt virtual package > > is well specified, but the todo one is not. > > > > Do you envision to have packages depending on todo and then use the > > todo binary ? > > > > No. This is a means to allow topydo and todotxt-cli to use "todo" without > crowding devtodo. I believe this meets the definition of a virtual package > in the Policy.
I am not use I understand. Do you plan for /usr/bin/todo to be managed by update-alternatives ? That would require all alternatives to share a common interface. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here.
