On 2006-04-16 "Jamie L. Penman-Smithson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> The Date used in the Resent-Date header is not RFC compliant:
> RFC 2822[1]
> [section 3.3: Date and Time specification]
> A date-time specification MUST be semantically valid. That is, the
> day-of-the-week (if included) MUST be the day implied by the date,
> the numeric day-of-month MUST be between 1 and the number of days
> allowed for the specified month (in the specified year), the
> time-of-day MUST be in the range 00:00:00 through 23:59:60 (the
> number of seconds allowing for a leap second; see [STD12]), and the
> zone MUST be within the range -9959 through +9959.
> Specifically "the zone MUST be within the range -9959 through +9959".
> It should be:
> Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 12:33:07 +0000
> Making it RFC compliant causes DATE_IN_FUTURE to not be triggered:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep Resent-Date testspamass.stripped.correcttime
> Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 09:48:08 +0000
> Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 02:48:08 -0700
[...]
I see, thanks for the diagnosis.
<mode pedant>
SA seems to be too strict, it does not accept the old obs-zone
syntax. Fixing the header to be correct obs-zone syntax
Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 09:48:08 GMT
is not enough.
</>
cu andreas
--
The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does not constitute
tacit approval by the author or the publisher for any such projects,
howsoever undertaken. (c) Jasper Ffforde
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
