On 15.12.20 20:13, Russ Allbery wrote:
2.3 was a net improvement for me, although the code base on which I've
tested it is not all that large (about 35K lines including comments). I
think it's fine to move to 2.3 in the upcoming release. This falls within
the "normal" level of cppcheck false positives for me. (I should retest
some of my previous false positives that I've been suppressing and see if
others are fixed; they probably are.)
Ok, good to know.
The first and third issue are fixed in the upstream master branch. For the
second issue, upstream asked for a separate bug report which is at
https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/10062#ticket .
