On 5 January 2021 at 19:20, Michael R. Crusoe wrote:
| On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 19:12, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[email protected]> wrote:
| 
| > On 5 January 2021 at 18:41, Michael R. Crusoe wrote:
| >
| 
| 
| > | r-cran-matrix 1.3-0-1 causes a bug that is evidently fixed in version
| > | 1.3-2
| > |
| > 
https://github.com/PeteHaitch/DelayedMatrixStats/issues/70#issuecomment-753416812
| > |
| > | Could you consider updating the package to this newer version?
| >
| > Yes. I myself as upstream author of RcppArmadillo am affected by a change
| > in
| > Matrix 1.3-0, and have contacted its author / been contacted back.
| >
| > When I last checked this morning, Matrix 1.3-0 was still under review at
| > CRAN's incoming directory (a little like our NEW queue, and you can look at
| > it).  So whoever told you 1.3-2 was out (Hi, Pete!) was a little
| > overeager. AFAIK it is not yet on CRAN but shown as 'Archived' meaning CRAN
| > maintainers took a dimmer view of it than its authors.
| >
| 
| Ah, I saw 1.3-2 over at https://r-forge.r-project.org/R/?group_id=61 :-)

Yes, good point. We generally have Github (as well as the older R-Forge). In
case of a dire need I could make a pre-CRAN release but experience taught us
it is better to stick with CRAN.
 
| > I generally debianize CRAN packages the day of their CRAN inclusion and
| > run a
| > cron'ed mirror of CRAN updates (google 'eddelbuettel cranberriesfeed' or
| > look
| > at Twitter handle @CRANberriesFeed).
| >
| 
| Great! Looking forward to this getting fixed.
| 
| Thanks for your maintenance of this package.

My pleasure!

Dirk

-- 
https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | [email protected]

Reply via email to