In data venerdì 8 gennaio 2021 12:38:20 CET, Gianfranco Costamagna ha scritto: > llvm-toolchain-11 is now fixed, and clazy should be fixed too.
No, llvm-toolchain-11 is not fixed yet. > Unfortunately clazy seems to be missing a "break" relationship against old > llvm, and britney uses > the broken testing version to test it. It makes no sense for clazy to break and old llvm, it should be rather the other way round... but it shouldn't be needed. Also, the version in testing is *not* broken. clazy in testing is perfectly working, and it was the llvm-toolchain-11 upload that broke it. > I don't know if we can hint to let it migrate anyway, Considering nothing was actually done to fix the problems I reported earlier in this bug, I don't think that letting the newer llvm-toolchain-11 migrate and break also testing is an acceptable way forward. Even more so when there was *no* attempt by the Debian LLVM Maintainers (of which you are part) to debug what was the issue. All this "fix" did was to apply the diff I mentioned, which was to fix only a small part of the problems I reported. Also, reading it further, even the shlibs of all the other libraries need to be fixed: they all specify old versions (like 9~something) that are satisfied by any llvm-toolchain-11 version available, including prereleases. > Let me know if you have a solution for this issue, The Debian LLVM Maintainers ought to help debug why updating a new version suddently breaks software built against old versions of it. Sorry if I seem harsh: LLVM is a key component in a modern Debian system, so uploading new versions and providing almost no help on problems does not seem like a good idea for the distribution. -- Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.