These packages are not installed by users, so leaving them as FTBFS is not a big deal. If you want to clean it up, please feel free. I can certainly understand if people (e.g. me) want to spend their time doing other things.
X Santiago Vila: > On Sun, 8 Sep 2019, Ximin Luo wrote: > >> Santiago Vila: >>> reopen 931003 >>> found 931003 0.2.4-1 >>> fixed 931003 0.2.4-1+rm >>> thanks >>> >>> Hi. >>> >>> This was automatically closed by ftpmaster because the package was >>> removed from unstable, but this still does not fix the FTBFS problem >>> in stable. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >> >> Please be aware that the Debian Rust team today *does not make any >> effort* towards bugs affecting Debian Stable. [...] > > Not even FTBFS bugs, as it is the case here? > > There are already 74 packages which FTBFS in stable (by my count), it > would be much better if every mantainer cared about their own packages. > I'm curious: does this really sound unreasonable for you? > > Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > Pkg-rust-maintainers mailing list > pkg-rust-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-rust-maintainers > -- GPG: ed25519/56034877E1F87C35 https://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git
