On Sun, 17 Jan 2021, 23:04 Mattia Rizzolo, <mat...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 11:01:12PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > Or is there any reason offlineimap3 should not be in bullseye? > > > > But offlineimap3 can only migrate after offlineimap is removed and > > src:python-imaplib2 drops its python2 package, so I guess its better > > to go ahead with the RM while I wait for upstream's reply. If it is > > not removed by then, then I will upload the transitional package like > > Mattia suggested. > > Then, what about this other way: > * src:python-imaplib2 drops its python2 lib > * ftp-master forces its removal, while keeping src:offlineimap > ? > I have requested the maintainer to drop the python2 lib at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937831#27 but why do you want to keep src:offlineimap? -- Regards Sudip
