Hi Antonio, Thanks for the reply!
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 08:47:01PM +0100, Antonio Radici wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 09:07:37AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Control: tags 980326 + patch > > Control: tags 980326 + pending > > > > Hi Antonio, > > > > I've prepared an NMU for mutt (versioned as 2.0.2-1.1) and > > uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I > > should delay it longer (or shorter). > > > > Actually IMHO it would be more sensible to rebase to the current > > upstream version and cherry-pick the additional commits already queued > > for stable. > > > > Thanks for the patch, I will upgrade to the latest upstream version by Sunday > this week, I have no problem with the NMU! Ok perfect :). Then I cancel the NMU! > Does it make sense? When you talk about "additional commits already queued for > stable" what are you referring to? Yes defintively, I think that's the better option for unstable (and so bullseye, just need to make sure it will migrate). With additional commits I mean that after the 2.0.4 release (and since no release was cut for 2.0.5) there are commits in https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/commits/stable/ which seems woth to pick as well. Apart the above commit (which now has CVE-2021-3181 assigned) there are other commits like two more memory leak fixes. Thanks for your work! Regards, Salvatore
