Em 13 de fevereiro de 2021 21:42:56 BRT, c01d <c...@gmx.com> escreveu: >Package: vrms >Version: 1.27 >Severity: normal > >Dear Maintainer :) > > * What led up to the situation? > > I checked my system with vrms. I have zoom installed > (.deb-file from their server). > > While my skypeforlinux-version is correctly shown as non-free, > zoom is not: > > % dpkg -l | grep zoom > ii zoom 5.4.57862.0110 amd64 Zoom, blabla > > but for example: > > % vrms > Non-free packages installed on main > [lots of stuff, not zoom] > skypeforlinux > [more stuff] > > * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)? > * What was the outcome of this action? > * What outcome did you expect instead? > >I expected zoom to be shown by vrms. > >Thank you! > >-- System Information: >Debian Release: bullseye/sid > APT prefers unstable >APT policy: (999, 'unstable'), (990, 'testing'), (500, >'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') >Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) >Foreign Architectures: i386 > >Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-13-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads) >Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE >Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), >LANGUAGE=en_GB:en >Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash >Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) >LSM: AppArmor: enabled > >-- no debconf information
What does dpkg -s zoom (or whatever the package is called) outputs? If it doesn't claim the section to be non-free/something, then vrms won't know that it should be counted as non-free. If the package doesn't have a non-free mark in the section, then that is a bug in the zoom package and should be reported there. Regards, Rogério Brito. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
