On Du, 21 mar 21, 13:01:07, Justin B Rye wrote: > Robert Edmonds wrote: > > During the bullseye release cycle the default /etc/unbound/unbound.conf > > file was changed to use the newly introduced "include-toplevel:" > > directive rather than the "include:" directive. This should probably be > > mentioned in the bullseye release notes because it will break > > configurations where the user added a clauseless config file fragment to > > /etc/unbound/unbound.conf.d/. > > > > The text from /usr/share/doc/unbound/NEWS.Debian.gz about this change is > > quoted below. > > For the Release Notes we ought to add some material: people reading > the NEWS file can be assumed to have chosen to install unbound, but > this version needs to start by making it clear what unbound is (and > that if you haven't heard of it you don't need to read the technical > details). Then after that we could squeeze things a bit:
[snip two paragraphs] > Is that compressed too far? I was hoping to fit the word "robustness" > somewhere. Maybe a mention of unbound-checkconf? How about squeezing even further and pointing to the NEWS file instead (for those that have unbound installed, but not apt-listchanges). Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
