ping
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 05:33:27PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 09:52:08AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Control: found -1 4.5.1527308405.8b586d5-4.2 > > > > Hi Frédéric, Hideki, > > > > On 17-02-2021 22:01, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > If the forth time worked because of sheer luck, then please no, keep the > > > bug open until the build is less flaky. We need packages to be build > > > without failure [1]. Having to baby-sit flaky is not really an option as > > > there are too many packages in the Debian archive. > > > > I had a look at the reproducible build project history for os-autoinst > > [1] and the package FTBFS very, very often, both in unstable and > > testing. I have marked this bug as found, so now this package is able to > > migrate, *but* you'll have to fix this bug if you want the package to > > ship with bullseye. If you can't fix the tests and still believe that > > the package is in a good shape for the bullseye release, I suggest you > > disable the tests for now. > > Or if the package is not in a good shape on i386, > remove it from the architecture list. > > os-autoinst is amd64-only in buster. > > > Paul > >... > > cu > Adrian
