Julian Mehnle wrote: > I still think that my original assessment is true, that this is > actually a bug in syslog-ng, and that this bug should not be closed > until it has been fixed in syslog-ng. > > Are there any indications to the contrary?
Oops, I have read Balazs' analysis[1] only now, and it makes sense to me. Please ignore me previous objection. References: 1. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356700#msg64
pgp0lDdLl4vTX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
