Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Tue, 2021-04-20 at 21:42 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2021-04-19 21:15:06 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > I guess the diff against the current buster package is quite > > > > large > > > > by > > > > this point? > > > > > > What do you mean by this point? We did full clamav uploads in the > > > past. > > > Please excuse if I miss something obvious. > > > > Sorry, that may have been poor phrasing on my part. I simply meant > > between the current and proposed packages, as we're changing the > > upstream major version tree being followed. > > Correct, we advance from 102 to 103. The 102 series seems not to be > updated anymore. As I tried to argue why I don't think it that is > enough to backport that one CVE that also applies to 102 (as done by > the LTS team) it terms of security and support.
I'm certainly happy to defer to your judgement here, given our previous experience with clamav updates in stable. I was simply trying to ascertain the scale of the update involved, but fear I may have just confused the discussion; perhaps it doesn't really matter that much, in the end. Please feel free to upload. I assume that, given there are security fixes involved, you'd prefer an early release via stable-updates as we've done with a number of updates in the past? Regards, Adam
