On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 22:42:10 +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:

> gregor herrmann, on 2021-04-21 17:32:18 +0200:
> > In case someone has the time, a second pair of eyes on the prepared
> > fix for #987095 would be welcome.
> 
> I've been looking at rdepends and build-rdeps of libgraph-perl,
> and they are mostly building and autopkgtesting without any
> issues related to the change brought by your patch, derived from
> upstream.

Thank you, much appreciated!
 
> The only problem I caught is libchado-perl autopkgtest.  The
> package does not declare any Testsuite, and the d/rules test
> target is skipped, due to needing a database access.  But if I
> trigger an autopkgtest, then the autodep8 starts, and chokes on
> a couple of issues.  I'm not too sure whether this is blocking,
> but if so, will need to ping Debian Med.

Hm … Good question. And it raises some questions :)

- Do the problems happen with the libgraph-perl version in stable and
  testing/unstable as well?
- What did you do to run which tests? (I stared at the package bit
  but it's not really obvious to me).
- Which tests fail how? (I only see ./t/01_okay.t which triest to
  load Bio::Chado::LoadDBI which doesn't exist anywhere in Debian ?!)
- Does this package actually use modules from libgraph-perl?
  (Grepping show some Bio::Graphics stuff but libbio-graphics-perl
  doesn't depend on libgraph-perl.)  
- Do you have any output or any other details?


Cheers,
gregor, cc'ing the bug report

-- 
 .''`.  https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org
 : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D  85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06
 `. `'  Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Beatles

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature

Reply via email to