Am Freitag, den 04.06.2021, 10:55 -0700 schrieb Vagrant Cascadian: > On 2021-06-04, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > On Thu, 03 Jun 2021 16:01:46 -0700 Vagrant Cascadian <vagr...@debian.org> > > wrote: > > > While I can see value in increased verbosity in some situations, it > > > would be nice to be able to get mmdebstrap's simple and minimal progress > > > bar output while still using bdebstrap for the configuration and other > > > features it provides. > > > > > > Simply removing the "-v" argument in /usr/bin/bdebstrap appears to work > > > fine, though obviously people who want the increased verbosity will need > > > to add it back somehow. > > > > I thought about it. bdebstrap produces some log messages as well. Do > > you want to tweak the verbosity of mmdebstrap and bdebstrap separately? > > > > One simple change would be to couple the verbosity of bdebstrap and > > mmdebstrap: > > > > * normal mode: uses info level and pass -v to mmdebstrap > > * --debug: uses debug level and pass -v to mmdebstrap > > * --quiet: use warning level and don't pass -v to mmdebstrap > > > > I have implemented that in the quiet branch for testing it: > > https://github.com/bdrung/bdebstrap/tree/quiet > > > > What do you think? > > Works for me! > > The only thing is I'm not sure if someone *might* want a --silent > option, but that's not currently me. :)
--silent as alias for --quiet? I just had a look at the man page of mmdebstrap. It has a --quiet/--silent option as well. Is it better to align the log level of bdebstrap with mmdebstrap? So add the same option to bdebstrap than mmdebstrap and just pass it down? -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer
