Hi Adrian

Am 12.07.21 um 14:51 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Background:
https://www.debian.org/releases/testing/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#openstack-cgroups
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959022#66

I noticed a version of libcgroup with support for control groups v2
is now in experimental.

Given then known problems with the libcgroup currently in bullseye
(it only works when booting with special kernel parameters),
this bug is a question to the release team and the OpenStack
maintainer whether updating libcgroup in bullseye to the version
currently in experimental might be the smaller evil compared
to the current release notes approach.


Complete diffstat compared to the version in testing:
  223 files changed, 73421 insertions(+), 34626 deletions(-)
Diff of debian/ is attached.

The new version adds autopkgtests, but they aren't currently run:
   SKIP Test requires machine-level isolation but testbed does not provide that

No new bugs are reported in the BTS.

This was already discussed in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959022

My takeaway from that discussion was, that rdeps of cgroup-tools, would itself have to be made cgroupv2 aware, especially OpenStack and its components. Have those rdeps been tested successfully with libcgroup/cgroup-tools from experimental?

Regards,
Michael

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to