Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 02:35:55AM -0500, nelson g wrote:
> Package: linux-image-amd64
> Version: 5.10.46-2
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: ledu...@hotmail.com
> 
> Hello,
> 
> My system is stuck with HPET clocksource
> 
> dmesg | egrep -i 'tsc|hpet|clocksource'
> [    0.000000] tsc: Fast TSC calibration using PIT
> [    0.000000] tsc: Detected 2096.096 MHz processor
> [    0.004968] ACPI: HPET 0x00000000B90A3000 000038 (v01 LENOVO TP-R11
> 00001210 PTEC 00000002)
> [    0.005018] ACPI: Reserving HPET table memory at [mem 
> 0xb90a3000-0xb90a3037]
> [    0.014115] ACPI: HPET id: 0x43538210 base: 0xfed00000
> [    0.014183] clocksource: refined-jiffies: mask: 0xffffffff max_cycles:
> 0xffffffff, max_idle_ns: 7645519600211568 ns
> [    0.059588] clocksource: hpet: mask: 0xffffffff max_cycles: 0xffffffff,
> max_idle_ns: 133484873504 ns
> [    0.079620] clocksource: tsc-early: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles:
> 0x1e36c89f085, max_idle_ns: 440795235573 ns
> [    0.199622] TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#1]:
> [    0.199622] Measured 5479288407 cycles TSC warp between CPUs, turning off
> TSC clock.
> [    0.199622] tsc: Marking TSC unstable due to check_tsc_sync_source failed
> [    0.216551] clocksource: jiffies: mask: 0xffffffff max_cycles: 0xffffffff,
> max_idle_ns: 7645041785100000 ns
> [    0.373390] hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 0
> [    0.373393] hpet0: 3 comparators, 32-bit 14.318180 MHz counter
> [    0.375642] clocksource: Switched to clocksource hpet
> [    0.392540] clocksource: acpi_pm: mask: 0xffffff max_cycles: 0xffffff,
> max_idle_ns: 2085701024 ns
> [    1.137978] rtc_cmos 00:01: alarms up to one month, y3k, 114 bytes nvram,
> hpet irqs
> 
> 
> Sorry to bother but I'd like to report to debian this known bug in
> bugzilla.kernel = https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202525 and 
> Lenovo
> = https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/Other-Linux-Discussions/Clocksource-falling-
> back-to-HPET-bec-TSC-is-unstable-ThinkPad-E14-Gen-2-maybe-others/m-p/5036464

If I did follow correctly the bugzilla entry then this is actually
something which needs to be fixed in firmware.

So I would tend to close this one again. 

Regards,
Salvatore

Reply via email to