Hi,

On 05-08-2021 20:23, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Stig,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 07:33:39PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>
>> On 20-07-2021 21:46, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:06:37PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 13:00, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen <s...@debian.org> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Attached is the diff. Changes are the upstream bugfix, as well as two
>>>>> commits in the packaging repository:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.  Please go ahead and upload to unstable, then remove the moreinfo 
>>>> tag
>>>> once it has built.
>>>
>>> Hello Graham,
>>>
>>> Thanks, will do.
>>
>> Bug #991348 has been raised do this upload. What's the proposal out of
>> the current situation?
> 
> Though probably too late now for this? (I assume we will face the same
> problem for varnish to be released either via bullseye-security or
> bullseye-pu?)

I think the question is, are the varnish-modules incompatible due to the
CVE fixes, or due to other changes included in the upload.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to