El 31/08/21 a las 14:45, Thomas Goirand escribió:
> Hi Santiago,
> 
> Thanks for this bug report, I'll be working on it.

Thanks!

> 
> On 8/30/21 5:19 PM, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > To know if cgroup v2 is supported, one way is to
> > `grep cgroup2 /proc/mounts`
> 
> I am really unsure about this. On Bullseye, for example, we do have
> cgroup2 mounted just like in Sid, though the new syntax wont work. What
> we need here is a way to tell what version of the cgset/cgcreate
> userland binary is there, preferably with something distribution agnostic...

Mmm, you need to make sure of two things: 1) the version of cgroup fs
available in the system, and 2) the version of cgroup-tools (which is
independent of 1)). You can install cgroup-tools without
mounting any cgroup file system, so I don't think knowing the version of
cgset/cgcreate is a fully reliable solution.

For 2), I'd prefer a versioned Depends on cgroup-tools (>= 2.0-2).

> Maybe the only way is to just attempt the old style cgset, see if it
> fails, and if it does, do v2 style cgset?

For 1), I'd chose to test v2 first, and then v1. Remember that v1 is not
mounted by default.

> I'd prefer a better way to detect the cgroup version if available.
...

If you can propose a better way, I am all ears.

Cheers,

 -- S

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to