On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 16:27:27 +0200 Robin Jarry <ro...@jarry.cc> wrote:

> 2021-09-02, Vadim Zeitlin:
> > Package: buildbot-worker
> > Version: 2.10.1-1
> > Severity: normal
> > 
> > Dear Maintainer,
> > 
> > Setting WORKER_OPTIONS in /etc/default/buildbot-worker to e.g. "--verbose"
> > doesn't work because its value is used in a wrong place in the init.d
> > script: it does
> > 
> >         "$WORKER_RUNNER $op ${WORKER_OPTIONS[$mi]} ${WORKER_BASEDIR[$mi]}
> > 
> > when the correct syntax would be
> > 
> >         "$WORKER_RUNNER ${WORKER_OPTIONS[$mi]} $op ${WORKER_BASEDIR[$mi]}
> > 
> > i.e. the options must come before the operation for buildbot-worker, not
> > after it.
> 
> Actually, this is only true for the --verbose option. Other options must
> be passed after $op.

 Hello and thank you for your reply!

 Yes, indeed, sorry, I haven't realized this. Even the symmetric --quiet
option does need to come after the operation. So this looks like poor
buildbot command line UI and not a problem in the package itself, finally.

> I see that you are using systemd. You should not use the init.d script
> but the systemd unit template which is provided with the package. There
> are examples in the man page to tweak the unit parameters:
> 
> https://manpages.debian.org/bullseye/buildbot-worker/buildbot-worker.7.en.html#systemd
> 
> In your case, you should override ExecStart= in a drop-in file.

 Oh, I see... it's really a comedy of errors and it looks like I did just
about everything wrong because I did try using systemd, but when I saw that
the buildbot-worker.service was masked, I've removed the file
/lib/systemd/system/buildbot-worker.service to unmask it -- instead of
using buildbot-worker@$NAME which is, as I now understand, the right thing
to do. And while this allowed me to run "systemctl start buildbot-worker",
in the meanwhile I had added "--verbose" to the defaults file to help me
debugging the problem and this "--verbose" actually prevented things from
working.

> Also, it looks like this is a duplicate of bug #993521. Should I close
> the first one?

 Yes, sorry about this one too, I've resent the bug report accidentally.
I've tried to correct the problem by merging the 2 reports, but I'm not
sure if I made things better or worse by doing it.

 In any case, it looks like both bug reports should be closed and the only
thing to do might be to update the comment in the defaults file to say that
the "--verbose" option can't be used there.

 Thanks again for your reply and explanations!
VZ

Attachment: pgpdR0QSDOh5j.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to