On Tuesday 25 April 2006 17:43, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 04:26:04PM +0200, Achim Bohnet wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 April 2006 16:18, Achim Bohnet wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 25 April 2006 13:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [...]
> > > digikamimageplugins is not using libXcursor.la directly. It indirectly
> > > inherits it for some .la of another pkg in the build dependency
> > > tree (pkg not rebuild with the X11R7 yet I assume).
> > >
> > > I see that libkipi, libkexif and digikam also failed to build on m68k
> > > (these pkgs are build deps of digikamimageplugins)
> > > so it could well be that the older debs still refer to libXcursor.la
> > > and libXrender.la
> >
> > Hi Wouter,
> > Sorry I forgot to ask:
> >
> > Can you trigger a rebuild of the build failure in this
> > order on m68k:
> >
> > libkexif
> > libkipi
> > digikam
> > digikamimageplugins
> >
> > or have I to ask on debian-release to trigger it?
>
> No, we need to do that.
okay.
>
> But there's a bigger problem with QT4 not building on m68k currently due
> to a compiler bug. That'll need fixing before any of that will make
> sense.
FWIW, all KDE apps do depend on qt3 not qt4. So all KDE apps do not care
about qt4 but the missing kdelibs4-dev as already reported by Fathi.
Achim
--
To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
You discover truth everytime you use it.
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
