Control: reopen 994778 Control: severity 994778 minor Control: tags 994778 +upstream
Hallo, * corubba [Mon, Oct 11 2021, 08:40:33PM]: > Dear Maintainer, > > unfortunately the bug is not yet fully fixed. Well, I used your test vectors for the unit tests and considered it done. :-) > These do work now as expected: > BindAddress=:: -> binds to [::]:3142 > BindAddress=:::1 -> throws an "invalid address" error > BindAddress=[::]:1 -> binds to [::]:1 > BindAddress=1:: -> binds to [1::]:3142 > BindAddress=::1 -> binds to [::1]:3142 > BindAddress=[1::1] -> binds to [1::1]:3142 > BindAddress=[1:2:3:4:5:6:7:8] -> binds to [1:2:3:4:5:6:7:8]:3142 > BindAddress=[1:2::7:8] -> binds to [1:2::7:8]:3142 > BindAddress=[1:2:3:4:5:6:7:::8] -> throws an "invalid address" error > BindAddress=[1:2:3:4:5:6:7:8:9] -> throws an "invalid address" error We will see where it fits. This might be fixed in the next major version, or in the next generation where I considered switching the whole parser code to a 3rd party lib. > These still don't work as expected: > BindAddress=1::1 -> binds to nothing, should be > [1::1]:3142 > BindAddress=1:2:3:4:5:6:7:8 -> binds to nothing, should be > [1:2:3:4:5:6:7:8]:3142 > BindAddress=1:2::7:8 -> binds to [1:2::7]:8 but should be > [1:2::7:8]:3142 > BindAddress=1:2:3:4:5:6:7:::8 -> binds to [1:2:3:4:5:6:7::]:8 but > should throw an "invalid address" error > BindAddress=1:2:3:4:5:6:7:8:9 -> binds to [1:2:3:4:5:6:7:8]:9 but > should throw an "invalid address" error Best regards, Eduard.
